.doc <\/span>journals are committed to upholding the highest standards of publication ethics. The editorial and publication processes of the journal are shaped in accordance\u00a0with the Principles of Transparency and Best Practice in Scholarly Publishing published by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), the Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ), and the Open Access Scholarly Publishers Association (OASPA), and the World Association of Medical Editors (WAME).<\/span><\/p>\n All parties involved in the publishing process (Editors, Reviewers, Authors, and Publishers) are expected to agree on the following ethical principles:<\/span><\/p>\n Additionally;<\/span><\/p>\n Plagiarism:\u00a0<\/b>Republishing all or part of another author\u2019s work as if it was the owner, without reference.<\/span><\/p>\n Fabrication:\u00a0<\/b>Publishing data and results that do not exist.<\/span><\/p>\n Copying: <\/b>The case of using data from another publication, including reproduction of a publication in other languages.<\/span><\/p>\n Slicing: <\/b>Artificially dividing the result of a study into multiple publications.<\/span><\/p>\n Authors submit their articles through the\u00a0<\/span>.doc <\/span>journals online manuscript submission system. The submitted manuscripts are first checked in terms of technical aspects. The language, figures, tables, necessary documents related to the article (author contribution form, copyright approval form, patient consent for case reports, ethics committee approval), references are reviewed, and plagiarism is checked. The manuscript that passes this stage is forwarded to the editor-in-chief. The editor-in-chief evaluates whether the manuscript\u2019s content is compatible with the journal\u2019s publication policy, whether it is prepared following the journal\u2019s publication rules, and the manuscript\u2019s scientific contribution to the field. After this evaluation, if appropriate, the manuscript is directed to the editor to initiate the scientific content control process. The editor assigns at least two reviewers through the system to evaluate the manuscript\u2019s scientific content and report their suggestions, criticisms, and contributions. They also direct it to the Statistics Editor when it deems necessary. The editor cares for selecting the reviewers among experts who do not have a conflict of interest with the authors. While the manuscript is sent to the reviewers, the information of the author and the institution where the study was conducted is hidden to prevent any bias. The editor evaluates the reviewers\u2019 suggestions, criticisms, and contributions, and if they find them sufficient, forwards them to the author. When the editor deems it necessary, they direct the manuscript to other reviewers. The names of the reviewers are hidden while the suggestions, criticisms, and contributions are forwarded to the authors. Thus, it is ensured that the scientific content of the manuscripts is evaluated in a double-blind way, away from bias and objectively. After the authors make the necessary arrangements, the manuscript is sent back to the editor, and the editor sends it to the reviewers for re-evaluation. Manuscripts deemed sufficient in this evaluation are accepted for publication. Manuscripts deemed unsuitable for publication by the reviewers are rejected. Manuscripts for which they want new corrections and edits are sent back to the authors. After the manuscript accepted for publication is reviewed by the English and Turkish language editors, the As publisher, <\/span>.<\/span>doc <\/span>prepares it for publication and sends it to the authors for final check and approval. The ready articles are published on the journal\u2019s website.<\/span><\/p>\n The Editor-in-chief evaluates articles regardless of the authors\u2019 age, ethnicity, gender, nationality, religious beliefs, sexual orientation, and political affiliation.<\/span><\/p>\n The reviewer evaluations should be objective. A reviewer is expected to evaluate by considering the following points:<\/span><\/p>\n The reviewers should ensure that all information regarding the submitted articles remains confidential until the article is published and report any copyright infringement and plagiarism on the author\u2019s part to the editor.<\/span><\/p>\n If the reviewer is not competent on the article\u2019s subject or if it does not seem possible to provide a timely response, they should inform the editor as soon as possible and ask them not to involve themselves in the referee process.<\/span><\/p>\n Articles are the private property of the authors. Reviewers and editorial board members may not discuss articles with other people.<\/span><\/p>\n .<\/span>doc<\/span> journals are open-access publications and the Journals\u2019s publication model is based on Budapest Open Access Initiative (<\/span>BOAI)<\/span> declaration. <\/span><\/p>\n All content published in the journals is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 International License<\/a>, allowing third parties to use the content for non-commercial purposes as long as they credit the original work. This license allows for the content to be shared and adapted for non-commercial purposes, promoting the dissemination and use of the research published in the journal.<\/p>\n All published content is available online, free of charge.<\/p>\n Authors must obtain permission from the copyright holder when using previously published content, including figures, tables, or any other material in both print and electronic formats. Legal, financial, and criminal liabilities in this regard belong to the author(s).<\/p>\n .<\/span>doc<\/span> journals require each submission to be accompanied by a Copyright License Agreement. By signing the Copyright License Agreement, the authors agree that the article, if accepted for publication by <\/span>.doc <\/span>journals, will be licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (<\/span>CC-BY-NC 4.0<\/b><\/a>).<\/span><\/p>\n\n
\n
\n
\n
PEER REVIEW PROCESS<\/h3>\n
\n
OPEN ACCESS STATEMENT<\/b><\/h3>\n
COPYRIGHT<\/h3>\n